I really liked this movie too. The vampires themselves I think were the best part. Just damn creepy.
Did anyone read Ebert's review? It was inaccurate. For example, he had no idea how the vampires got to the town, so he surmised that they must have trekked miles and miles in just their street clothes. He also said that the old coot trying to escape was missing from the film. Huh?! I generally agree with his writings, but I don't think he was paying attention to this movie.
Did anybody else see this? I can't say that it'd be high on my "must watch" list, but for what it was, it was pretty decent. It probably would have been complete dross without Matt Lucas, who was amazingly funny.