The W
Views: 97630394
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.7.14 0557
The W - Football - 2013 BCS Standings: Week 2 of 8
This thread has 4 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.16
Pages: 1
(41 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.48
BCS Standings             BCS  Prev  Harris Int.    USA Today       Computer Rankings
through 10/27 Avg Week Rank Pts % Rank Pts % Avg 1 2 3 4 5 6 %
1. Alabama (8-0) .9937 1 1 2590 .9962 1 1542 .9948 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 .990
2. Oregon (8-0) .9517 3 2 2492 .9585 2 1483 .9568 2 3 2 1 2 4 3 .940
3. Florida State (7-0) .9211 2 3 2386 .9177 3 1419 .9155 3 2 5 4 3 1 2 .930
4. Ohio State (8-0) .8840 4 4 2301 .8850 4 1375 .8871 4 4 3 3 8 5 4 .880
5. Stanford (7-1) .7918 6 6 2035 .7827 7 1182 .7626 5 6 4 5 4 6 6 .830
6. Baylor (7-0) .7645 8 5 2130 .8192 5 1293 .8342 10 10 11 7 12 9 10 .640
7. Miami, Fla. (7-0) .7560 7 7 1977 .7604 6 1190 .7677 6 5 15 6 7 8 9 .740
8. Clemson (7-1) .6687 9 8 1767 .6796 8 1064 .6865 10 11 7 11 10 11 8 .640
9. Missouri (7-1) .6096 5 9 1510 .5808 10 834 .5381 8 9 9 8 5 10 7 .710
10. Oklahoma (7-1) .6064 15 10 1475 .5673 9 933 .6019 9 7 6 9 11 13 12 .650
11. Auburn (7-1) .6025 11 11 1453 .5588 11 804 .5187 7 8 18 10 6 7 5 .730
12. Texas A&M (6-2) .4812 16 13 1364 .5246 14 758 .4890 14 16 19 13 13 18 14 .430
13. LSU (7-2) .4630 13 12 1408 .5415 13 802 .5174 16 20 10 23 15 20 16 .330
14. South Carolina (6-2) .4486 21 17 1043 .4012 16 627 .4045 12 12 8 18 9 16 13 .540
15. Texas Tech (7-1) .3749 10 14 1093 .4204 15 673 .4342 17 18 14 16 22 22 21 .270
16. Fresno State (7-0) .3669 17 18 965 .3712 18 542 .3497 15 13 25 14 -- 14 11 .380
17. Northern Illinois (8-0) .3335 18 20 650 .2500 20 373 .2406 13 17 12 12 14 3 15 .510
18. Oklahoma State (6-1) .3113 19 15 1081 .4158 12 803 .5181 29 -- -- -- -- -- -- .000
19. Louisville (7-1) .2599 20 16 1056 .4062 17 579 .3735 29 -- 17 -- -- -- -- .000
20. UCLA (5-2) .2338 12 19 683 .2627 19 432 .2787 21 25 20 -- 19 23 20 .160
21. Michigan (6-1) .1875 22 21 528 .2031 21 309 .1994 21 14 22 17 24 -- 25 .160
22. Michigan State (7-1) .1811 NR 23 391 .1504 24 237 .1529 18 23 -- 15 18 17 22 .240
23. Central Florida (6-1).1789 23 22 502 .1931 22 300 .1935 23 -- 16 25 -- 21 17 .150
24. Wisconsin (5-2) .0993 NR 24 350 .1346 23 253 .1632 29 -- -- -- -- -- -- .000
25. Notre Dame (6-2) .0928 NR 26 91 .0350 25 83 .0535 19 21 13 21 20 25 23 .190

1 Anderson & Hester
2 Billingsley
3 Colley Matrix
4 Massey
5 Sagarin
6 Wolfe




Promote this thread!
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 70 days
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.74
The only thing confusing to me is how Bama has the top spot in most computers. They've played the easiest schedule of the top three to date, with a two loss A&M being the only decent game. And they gave up over 600 yards in that one. I get human voters having them up there because it's Bama. But the computers...doesn't make sense.

Really counting on Stanford or LSU to help FSU out here. Voters decided before the season began that Oregon and Bama were the top two, and they'll refuse to change their mind no matter what if they win out.
lotjx
Scrapple








Since: 5.9.08

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 9 hours
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.11
I think the inherit problem for this the idea the SEC is a good conference. The ACC says otherwise. Alabama being number one has a lot to do with last year. Their schedule is ridiculous easy and LSU is the only team that could stop them prior to the SEC title game which at this point is going to be a team limping in with a two or three lose record. At last my Irish got in the Top 25, now can they keep til the Stanford game.



The Wee Baby Sheamus.Twitter: @realjoecarfley its a bit more toned down there. A bit.
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 70 days
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.74
What we need is for the human voters to realize what we're headed for and what they could alter it to become. As is, if the top four win and and stay the same ranking, we get Bama vs Oregon, Ohio State vs PAC 12 runner up and FSU vs maybe Fresno. One great game and two stinkers.

If FSU wins this weekend, they should think ahead(I know, homer talking) and move FSU to two while they can justify it. It's not like there is any real way to know how the top three should be anyway. That way, we could have Bama vs FSU and Oregon vs Ohio State. Still end up with two unbeaten teams, but much better Overall matchup with all undefeated teams playing each other.

(edited by wmatistic on 29.10.13 0647)
Java
Goetta








Since: 2.1.02
From: Chandler, AZ

Since last post: 268 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#5 Posted on
    Originally posted by wmatistic
    What we need is for the human voters to realize what we're headed for and what they could alter it to become. As is, if the top four win and and stay the same ranking, we get Bama vs Oregon, Ohio State vs PAC 12 runner up and FSU vs maybe Fresno. One great game and two stinkers.

    If FSU wins, they should think ahead(I know, homer talking) and move FSU to two while they can justify it. It's not like there is any real way to know how the top three should be anyway. That way, we could have Bama vs FSU and Oregon vs Ohio State. Still end up with two unbeaten teams, but much better Overall matchup with all undefeated teams playing each other.


You realize the playoffs start NEXT year, right? We still only have the BCS title game this year.
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 70 days
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.74
Of course. But I'd rather see this lineup and end with two undefeated teams than see Ohio State and FSU get stuck with crap and end Ending with maybe three unbeaten.
Thread rated: 3.16
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: the-w Survival Football: 2013.09
Next thread: 2013 BCS Standings: Week 3 of 8
Previous thread: the-w Survival Football: 2013.08
(41 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Looks like the AP may not have bothered to get the whole story (startribune.com).
- TheBucsFan, Culpepper Scrambles (2005)
Related threads: 2013 BCS Standings: Week 1 of 8 - Te'o, do you date bro? - Bama - More...
The W - Football - 2013 BCS Standings: Week 2 of 8Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.099 seconds.