The W
Views: 100006970
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.14 1830
The W - Football - 2012-2013 NFL Playoff standing after week 11
This thread has 63 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 7.20
Pages: 1
(142 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.24
NFC
1. Atlanta (9-1) South leader
2. San Francisco (7-2-1) West leader

3. Green Bay (7-3) North leader, beat Chicago
4. NY Giants (6-4) East leader
5. Chicago (7-3) lost to Green Bay
6. Seattle (6-4) (4-4 NFC) beat Minnesota, beat Tampa Bay on Conf record

7. Tampa Bay (6-4) (3-4 NFC) beat Minnesota, lost to Seattle on Conf record
8. Minnesota (6-4) lost to Seattle and Tampa Bay
9. New Orleans (5-5) (.500 SoV) beat Dallas on SoV
10 Dallas (5-5) (.380 SoV) lost to New Orleans on SoV
11 Washington (4-6) (4-4 NFC) beat Detrot and Arizona on Conf record

12 Detroit (4-6) (3-5 NFC) Beat Arizona on Conf Record
13 Arizona (4-6) (2-5 NFC) lost Washington and Detroit on Conf Record
14 St. Louis (3-6-1)
15 Philadelphia (3-7)
16 D-Carolina (2-8)

D - eliminated from Divisional title


* A Carolina loss and San Francisco or Green Bay win will eliminate Carolina from the #2 or #2 and #3 seeds.
* A Carolina loss and Chicago win will eliminate Carolina from the #5 seed.

* A Philadelphia loss or Atlanta win will eliminate Philadelphia from the #1 seed.

Wildcard
#6 Seattle (6-4) @ #3 Green Bay (7-3)
#5 Chicago (7-3) @ #4 NY Giants (6-4)

1st round bye
#1 Atlanta (9-1)
#2 San Francisco (7-2-1)

AFC
1. Houston (9-1) South leader
2. Baltimore (8-2) North leader

3. New England (7-3) East leader, Beat Denver
4. Denver (7-3) West leader, lost to New England
5. Indy (6-4) (4-3 AFC) beat Pittsburgh on Conf record
6. Pittsburgh (6-4) (3-4 AFC) lost to Indy on Conf record

7. Cincinnati (5-5)
8. San Diego (4-6) (4-3 AFC) beat Tennessee and NY Jets on Conf record
9. Tennessee (4-6) (3-4 AFC) Lost to San Diego on Conf record, beat NY Jets on Conf record
10 NY Jets (4-6) (3-4 AFC, 2-2 North) Beat Buffalo and Miami, lost to San Diego and Tennessee on Conf record
11 Buffalo (4-6) (3-5 AFC, 1-3 North) Lost to NY Jets, beat Miami

12 Miami (4-6) (3-5 AFC, 1-2 North)
13 Oakland (3-7)
14 Cleveland (2-8)
15 D-Jacksonville (1-9) (1-5 AFC) Beat KC on Conf record
16 Kansas City (1-9) (0-7 AFC) Lost to Jacksonville on Conf record

D - eliminated from Divisional title

* An Oakland loss or Houston win will eliminate Oakland from the #1 seed

* A Cleveland loss or Baltimore win will eliminate Cleveland from the AFC North title

* A Kansas City loss to Denver will eliminate Kansas City from the AFC West title

Wildcard
#6 Pittsburgh (6-4) @ #3 New England (7-3)
#5 Indy (6-4) @ Denver (7-3)

1st Round Bye
#1 Houston (9-1)
#2 Baltimore (8-2)


(edited by Zeruel on 19.11.12 2328)


-- 2006 Time magazine Person of the Year --
FuellyFuelly
-- July 2009 Ordained Reverend --
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 8 sec.
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.29
Shouldn't Green Bay be ahead of Chicago based on Head to Head?



thecubsfan.com - luchablog
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.24
    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    Shouldn't Green Bay be ahead of Chicago based on Head to Head?


You are correct sir.



-- 2006 Time magazine Person of the Year --
FuellyFuelly
-- July 2009 Ordained Reverend --
hansen9j
Andouille








Since: 7.11.02
From: Riderville, SK

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.59
    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    Shouldn't Green Bay be ahead of Chicago based on Head to Head?
Damn straight.



The Big Bossman raised the briefcase.

Go Pack Go! Owner of one (1) share. (7-3, T-1 NFC North)
Let's Go Riders! Owner of one (1) share. (Wait til next year...)
Big Bad
Scrapple








Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.69
Bears fans are reliving the same nightmare from last season of Cutler going down and the entire offense suddenly looking lost. The 49ers' D obviously played a big part in that but man.

I enjoy the NFL's recent scheduling wrinkle of saving most divisional games for the last six weeks of the season since it really leaves things up in the air. The Bucs and Falcons still have to play each other twice, and each have one more game against the Saints. The Vikings still have FOUR games against the Bears and Packers remaining. Houston plays Indy twice in the last three weeks. The 49ers still have to go to Seattle. Beginning last Sunday night, Pittsburgh plays five divisional foes over the last seven weeks.



"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." --- Bart Giamatti, on baseball
Thread rated: 7.20
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Week 13: Fighting Irish Rises
Next thread: 2012 BCS Standings: Week 7 of 8
Previous thread: 2012 BCS Standings: Week 6 of 8
(142 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
This reminds me a little bit of when Butch was coaching at U Miami. Granted, they were under probation sanctions from the NCAA for several years, and that was part of the problem. However, it was a very mediocre time for UM.
- FLRockAndLaw, The Browns offensive display (2004)
Related threads: 2012-2013 NFL Playoff standing after week 10 - 2012 wild card and divisional playoffs - 2011-2012 Week 16 NFL playoff seedings - More...
The W - Football - 2012-2013 NFL Playoff standing after week 11Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.111 seconds.