The W
Views: 97876665
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
1.8.14 1055
The W - Football - 2011 BCS Standings: Week 7 of 8
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.44
Pages: 1
(236 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.39
Sorry, I missed this last night - and they also messed up their links so you had to "hack" them just to find the stupid thing. So...hey, this is the easiest place on the Internet to find the full rankings! (Maybe!)
BCS Standings             BCS  Prev  Harris Int.    USA Today       Computer Rankings
through 11/27 Avg Week Rank Pts % Rank Pts % Avg 1 2 3 4 5 6 %
1. LSU (12-0) 1.0000 1 1 28751.0000 1 14751.0000 1 1 1 1 1 1 11.000
2. Alabama (11-1) .9551 2 2 2756 .9586 2 1411 .9566 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 .950
3. Oklahoma State (10-1) .8712 4 5 2414 .8397 5 1245 .8441 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 .930
4. Stanford (11-1) .8559 6 3 2512 .8737 4 1289 .8739 4 4 4 5 8 10 5 .820
5. Virginia Tech (11-1) .7811 5 4 2438 .8480 3 1291 .8753 10 8 9 9 13 18 11 .620
6. Houston (12-0) .7399 8 6 2147 .7468 6 1096 .7431 8 5 12 8 9 8 6 .730
7. Boise State (10-1) .7027 7 8 2092 .7277 8 1033 .7003 9 9 7 6 14 12 8 .680
8. Arkansas (10-2) .7003 3 9 1971 .6856 10 937 .6353 6 10 8 13 4 4 4 .780
9. Oregon (10-2) .6862 10 7 2107 .7329 7 1041 .7058 10 15 5 12 12 9 9 .620
10. Oklahoma (9-2) .6710 9 10 1768 .6150 11 882 .5980 5 6 6 4 6 6 10 .800
11. Kansas State (9-2) .5702 11 15 1348 .4689 15 681 .4617 6 7 10 7 5 5 7 .780
12. South Carolina (10-2).5684 12 14 1554 .5405 13 833 .5647 12 11 13 10 10 11 12 .600
13. Michigan State (10-2).5369 14 11 1704 .5927 9 941 .6380 16 17 11 16 18 20 15 .380
14. Georgia (10-2) .5348 13 12 1613 .5610 14 816 .5532 14 13 16 14 11 14 14 .490
15. Wisconsin (10-2) .4576 16 13 1567 .5450 12 852 .5776 19 19 14 18 24 25 18 .250
16. Michigan (10-2) .4310 15 16 1256 .4369 16 658 .4461 15 12 17 11 17 22 17 .410
17. Baylor (8-3) .3910 18 18 900 .3130 18 457 .3098 13 14 18 15 7 7 13 .550
18. TCU (9-2) .3310 20 17 980 .3409 17 534 .3620 18 21 15 19 23 19 16 .290
19. Nebraska (9-3) .2578 21 19 773 .2689 19 390 .2644 20 18 19 17 25 24 19 .240
20. Clemson (9-3) .1979 17 20 632 .2198 21 286 .1939 21 22 20 21 22 23 21 .180
21. Penn State (9-3) .1382 19 22 415 .1443 22 192 .1302 23 20 21 20 -- -- 23 .140
22. Texas (7-4) .1334 25 25 160 .0557 26 51 .0346 17 16 -- 22 15 13 20 .310
23. West Virginia (8-3) .1241 NR 21 495 .1722 20 295 .2000 29 -- -- 25 -- -- -- .000
24. Southern Miss (10-2) .0724 NR 23 287 .0998 23 173 .1173 29 -- -- 24 -- -- -- .000
25. Missouri (7-5) .0588 NR 32 16 .0056 31 16 .0108 22 23 24 -- 16 15 25 .160

1 Anderson & Hester
2 Billingsley
3 Colley Matrix
4 Massey
5 Sagarin
6 Wolfe




Promote this thread!
Texas Kelly
Lap cheong








Since: 3.1.02
From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.20
Ladies and gentlemen, the following public service message is brought to you by your friends from D-Generation X, who would like to remind each and every one of you that if you're not down with that, we've got two words for you...

Alabama needs to root like hell for the Oklahoma Sooners, because they're totally going to get jumped and squeezed out of the NCG if Oklahoma State beats them. The Cowboys would have the dual benefit of a conference title and a stronger overall profile (in terms of quality wins) as compared to the Crimson Tide working in their favor, and the scenario of a conference champion jumping a non-champion in the last week of the season has happened twice in recent years - and both times, the team that did the jumping won the national title.(Personally, as an Auburn fan, I'd love nothing more than to see Georgia get a last-second win over LSU and Oklahoma State to prevail, which would knock #3 Alabama out of the BCS completely due to the two-team rule.)

(edited by Texas Kelly on 2.12.11 1642)


e-mail me at texas (dot) kelly (at) gmailread a bunch of incoherent nonsense
now 52% more incoherent!
smark/net attack Advisory System is Elevatedsmark/net attack Advisory System Status is: Elevated
(Holds; June 18, 2006)
While the switch from Cena to RVD should alleviate some complaints, the inevitability of the belt's return to Cena (note where Summerslam is this year) and the poor initial showing by the new ECW are enough to keep the indicator where it is for now. The pieces are in place, though, especially on RAW, for improvements to be made to the IWC's psyche in the near future.
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08
I don't think beating OU means that much at this point. It's big to a degree, but the Sooner late loss takes a lot away from it. Plus the one team that OSU did lose to really, really sucks. Couple that with most people agreeing Bama really did outplay LSU the first time around, and I would expect Bama to stay ahead with the human voters. Computers may try to push OSU ahead, but it'll be very close.

Not to mention I wouldn't bet on OSU actually beating Oklahoma anyway. LSU/Georgia should be fun, I'm actually expecting a Georgia win just because we can't go a whole season with a Les Miles team not shitting the bed at least once.
Texas Kelly
Lap cheong








Since: 3.1.02
From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.20
Ladies and gentlemen, the following public service message is brought to you by your friends from D-Generation X, who would like to remind each and every one of you that if you're not down with that, we've got two words for you...

    Originally posted by wmatistic
    I don't think beating OU means that much at this point. It's big to a degree, but the Sooner late loss takes a lot away from it.

I have to disagree with you on this for two reasons: 1) The Texas Tech loss was way more damaging to OU than the Baylor loss, with the Tech loss coming at home to a team that failed to win another game the rest of the season, and the Baylor loss coming on the road, to a team that had never beaten them in 20+ straight years of playing them (so it's easier to explain the loss away as a statistical anomaly), and who has a legitimate Heisman candidate in RG3. Certainly OU's BCS ranking dropped more after the first loss than the second one. 2) Everyone forgets about the huge stakes that are in play for OU here - if they beat the Cowboys, they go to the Fiesta, as they would have the tiebreaker over both OSU and Kansas State. What that means is that the importance of the game as a whole gets amplified (and, along with it, the value in perception to whoever comes out of it the winner) since both sides have something bigger than what most people think they'll get to play for.

    Originally posted by wmatistic
    Plus the one team that OSU did lose to really, really sucks.

I think Iowa State is a better team than it would appear on the surface. This is in large part because they've played an absolutely hellish schedule - seven of their nine Big 12 games (including this week's against Kansas State) have been against teams ranked at the time, including the OSU win and a win against Tech on the road when they were at the height of their season (right after the win in Norman) and when we had no idea the Red Raiders' total collapse was in the offering. (And if the Cyclones pull another upset out of their hat against the Wildcats, that only benefits the Cowboys' case more since the loss won't look as bad.) Additionally, the Cyclones held the Sooners to their second-lowest point total of the year - in their own stadium, no less - and with the endless amount of hype both sides of the Sooner game got going into the season, that counts a lot with me.

    Originally posted by wmatistic
    Couple that with most people agreeing Bama really did outplay LSU the first time around, and I would expect Bama to stay ahead with the human voters. Computers may try to push OSU ahead, but it'll be very close.

Yeah, but if one concedes that Alabama outplayed LSU, then the counter-argument is that the Crimson Tide lost the first time because they couldn't get out of their own way (turnovers, horrible play-calling in OT, etc.) I don't know about you, but to me, that makes for a weaker argument as to why they should get another crack at them.

    Originally posted by wmatistic
    Not to mention I wouldn't bet on OSU actually beating Oklahoma anyway.

I think that expectation is what's tempering people so much on the possibility of OSU jumping Alabama. If OSU wins, it's going to come off in such a way as to say, "I'm totally shocked by this result, but in retrospect, I shouldn't have been", and that only strengthens the case for the Cowboys more. (And that's just assuming the Cowboys come out with a straight win - if they blow the Sooners out of the stadium in the process, that'll turn even more heads.)

    Originally posted by wmatistic
    LSU/Georgia should be fun, I'm actually expecting a Georgia win just because we can't go a whole season with a Les Miles team not shitting the bed at least once.

Not expecting an LSU loss, but as I said before, would love to see it, especially if OSU wins. With the voters having proven so many times in the past how they value conference championship titles, the only reasonable conclusion in that scenario would be Oklahoma State (conference champion) vs. LSU (head-to-head win), leaving Alabama on the sidelines.

(edited by Texas Kelly on 2.12.11 1749)


e-mail me at texas (dot) kelly (at) gmailread a bunch of incoherent nonsense
now 52% more incoherent!
smark/net attack Advisory System is Elevatedsmark/net attack Advisory System Status is: Elevated
(Holds; June 18, 2006)
While the switch from Cena to RVD should alleviate some complaints, the inevitability of the belt's return to Cena (note where Summerslam is this year) and the poor initial showing by the new ECW are enough to keep the indicator where it is for now. The pieces are in place, though, especially on RAW, for improvements to be made to the IWC's psyche in the near future.
Reverend J Shaft
Liverwurst








Since: 25.6.03
From: Home of The Big House

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.52
Look I hate to play killjoy here but if OSU beating OU could possibly result in OSU jumping Alabama people wouldn't already be previewing the Alabama-LSU rematch. The computers may seem like a black box, but people already know the result even if OSU wins.

And there's no freaking way Georgia stands a chance against LSU. That game's gonna get ugly early. The SEC East may as well be called the SEC Easy.

EDIT: And I could very likely be wrong. LSU looks like a team that knows it could lose 40-0 and still get into the BCSCG.

(edited by Reverend J Shaft on 3.12.11 1717)
Texas Kelly
Lap cheong








Since: 3.1.02
From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.20
Ladies and gentlemen, the following public service message is brought to you by your friends from D-Generation X, who would like to remind each and every one of you that if you're not down with that, we've got two words for you...

Smell that? It's sweat dripping profusely off the collective skins of the Crimson Tide. OSU is making a STATEMENT.



e-mail me at texas (dot) kelly (at) gmailread a bunch of incoherent nonsense
now 52% more incoherent!
smark/net attack Advisory System is Elevatedsmark/net attack Advisory System Status is: Elevated
(Holds; June 18, 2006)
While the switch from Cena to RVD should alleviate some complaints, the inevitability of the belt's return to Cena (note where Summerslam is this year) and the poor initial showing by the new ECW are enough to keep the indicator where it is for now. The pieces are in place, though, especially on RAW, for improvements to be made to the IWC's psyche in the near future.
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 17 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.64
BCSGuru is projecting OSU to pass Alabama for #2.

(edited by thecubsfan on 4.12.11 0103)


thecubsfan.com - luchablog
lotjx
Scrapple








Since: 5.9.08

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 13 min.
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.09
    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    BCSGuru is projecting OSU to pass Alabama for #2.

    (edited by thecubsfan on 4.12.11 0103)


Well, they should. More Top 25 wins and actually won their division. I don't need to see the SEC Championship game part 2. Ok. State didn't shit the bed with their field goals or play at home in their loss. They lose to an ok team after learning about the plane crash of two members of the athletic department in an away game. Also, what does a rematch prove that either LSU was as good as they already proved against Bama or Bama can win in a neutral ground instead of at home? On top of the fact that if Bama wins its 1 to 1 in the series, so should we play another game? No, make it Ok. State and we don't have to deal with this nonsense.



The Wee Baby Sheamus.







Twitter: @realjoecarfley its a bit more toned down there. A bit.
Thread rated: 6.44
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: FINAL 2011 BCS Standings: Week 8 of 8
Next thread: Your Super Bowl XLVI halftime act is...
Previous thread: Jack Del Rio out, ownership next
(236 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
BCS Prev Harris Int. USA Today Computer Rankings BCS Standings through 11/28 Avg Week Rank Pts % Rank Pts % Avg 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 1. Auburn (12-0) .9779 2 2 2769 .9716 2 1419 .
Related threads: 2011 BCS Standings: Week 6 of 8 - BCS Chaos Question - 2011 BCS Standings: Week 5 of 8 - More...
The W - Football - 2011 BCS Standings: Week 7 of 8Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.106 seconds.