Originally posted by Guru ZimI tried it yesterday. it was very light on features.
Boy howdy, you ain't kiddin'. I finally opened this up to see what it was about and it didn't do ANYTHING I rely on PhotoShop to do at home.
It took me all of one web search and fifteen seconds to determine that the app I REALLY needed for my Windows machine at work was paint.net (getpaint.net). This thing has plugins up the wazoo for future graphical manipulations I don't even know I'll need, and it's freeware (but I may make a donation really soon since it looks like it's got everything I need).
I use Gimp (gimp.org) for my minimal photo-editing needs. That's not to imply that Gimp is lacking in features. I just don't need most of them. It's available for Windows and *nix systems, so I don't have to worry which OS I'm using. Has anybody that does any *REAL* photo-editing used both Gimp and Paint.net? How do they compare?
I use GiMP as well, but I don't know that I'd recommend it to everyone. It feels non-intuitive at times, it doesn't feel like a windows program (they can't find a way to use the normal file open/save dialouges and have to invent their own?) and I always feel like there's probably a better way to do things in there but I'll never be able to figure it out. I use about 5% of what it does because I have no idea how to start on the under 95% without a lot of googling.
Also "GiMP"? Someone thought that was a good idea for an acroynm, really?
GIMP doesn't feel like a Windows program because it isn't. It's a Linux app ported over using GTK. The dialogs are the standard GTK Open/Save dialogs. You'll see the same thing in Pidgin, another ported GTK app.
"I could drown the pain, and drink upon commuter trains, and here you stand in eastern standard time" - Mike Doughty